- Employers won the lowest percentage of discrimination jury trials this decade; only 39 percent. Employers won on 33 percent of age cases and 52 percent of disability discrimination cases. Expect employer’s winning percentage to decrease in disability discrimination cases in the next years as post-ADAAA cases make their way to juries.
- Age discrimination cases result in the largest verdicts followed by disability, sex and race.
- Employers are better off in federal court than state court. Employers won 43 percent of the cases in federal court versus only 37 percent in state court. The median federal jury award was also lower at $164,925 v. $270,000 in state court.
- Median settlement rose to the highest this past decade at $90,000.
Several reasons may explain Manpower’s most recent findings. First, the economy, and juror attitudes may be affecting outcomes. In my two most recent jury trials this year, there was a significant number of potential jurors who were either out of work or had a close family member who was unemployed. With the national unemployment rate topping 10 percent, the increase in the unemployment rate may signal that there are more prospective jurors who may sympathize with an unemployed plaintiff-employee.
Second, in a poor economy, some employers may choose to try cases they might have settled in the past. Some employers may elect to try those cases that can be tried to verdict for less than they can be settled. This may be a fiscally sound decision only in the short term or if the employer prevails at trial.
Finally, the results may reflect the fact that employers are having to try tougher cases to defend. In any event, Manpower’s research suggests that juror attitudes in employment discrimination cases are swinging in favor of plaintiff-employees and against employers.