On June 23, 2026, the Fifth Circuit issued its decision in Brenyah v. Columbia Hospital Corporation of Bay Area, affirming summary judgment for the employer on the plaintiff’s race and national origin discrimination, retaliation, ADA disability discrimination, ADA failure-to-accommodate, ADA interference, and Section 1981 -but reversing and remanding her Title VII and Section 1981

On May 28, 2026, the United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision in Flowers Foods, Inc. v. Brock, No. 24-935, holding that a local delivery driver who picks up and delivers goods entirely within one state can qualify for the Federal Arbitration Act’s transportation-worker exemption if his intrastate route forms part of a

On June 12, 2026, the Fifth Circuit issued its decision in Guilbeau v. Schlumberger Technology Corporation, No. 25-50594, holding that a hybrid compensation scheme combining a fixed biweekly salary with variable day rates qualified as “salary basis” pay under the FLSA, exempting the named plaintiff from overtime as a highly compensated employee (HCE).

Background

Since the COVID-19 pandemic and the necessity that many jobs be performed, at least temporarily, from home, employers and employees have litigated numerous disputes over when work-from-home eliminates an essential function of a position (i.e., onsite attendance) or is a reasonable accommodation. On May 8, 2026, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth

Earlier this year, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued a significant decision in Trinseo Europe GmbH v. Kellogg Brown & Root, L.L.C., No. 24-20460, providing important guidance on damages calculation in trade secret misappropriation cases. The case demonstrates the importance of apportioning damages among the various trade secrets that

On July 14, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued a significant decision addressing the application of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) overtime exemption for highly compensated employees (HCEs) in the oilfield services sector. In Gilchrist v. Schlumberger Technology Company, the court reversed a district court ruling and held

On June 5, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision clarifying the evidentiary standard for Title VII disparate treatment claims.  The Court held that plaintiffs who are members of a majority group—such as heterosexuals, men, or whites—are not required to meet a heightened evidentiary burden to establish a prima facie case of discrimination. 

The case arose from a dispute involving an SMU professor who alleged she was denied tenure due to discrimination and retaliation. In addition to statutory discrimination and retaliation claims against the University, she brought common law claims for defamation and fraud against individual co-workers, based on statements and actions taken during the tenure review process.

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held that “the preponderance-of-the-evidence standard applies when an employer seeks to prove that an employee is exempt from the minimum-wage and overtime-pay provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).” The Court reversed the Fourth Circuit, which had affirmed the District Court’s use of the “clear-and-convincing-evidence standard” in favor