In a recent case from the Fifth Circuit, the Court held that attorney’s fees are not recoverable for a prevailing plaintiff in a Title VII mixed-motive retaliation case. In Carter v. Luminant Power Serv. Co., the plaintiff employee brought a Title VII discrimination and retaliation claim alleging that he was disciplined for his complaints of
Quick Cites for Common Evidentiary Issues in Discrimination, Retaliation and Harassment Cases
Yesterday I had the privilege to serve on a panel discussion of employment defense attorneys covering Title VII Litigation: Persistent Evidentiary Challenges. We had lawyers from twenty-two states registered for the program. If you have an evidentiary question involving a discrimination, retaliation or harassment claim, these materials may provide you a head start on your research
Court Holds Ministerial Exception Bars Teacher’s Discrimination Suit
Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimouslyy held that the ministerial exception bars a federal employment discrimination suit brought by a teacher challenging her church-employer’s decision to terminate her employment. While this holding is limited to religious affiliated employers, it firmly establishes the ministerial exception as a bar to certain employment discrimination claims against religious organizations.
Plaintiff-Employee’s Case Dismissed for Giving Differing Reasons for Leaving Employment
In reading a recent Fifth Circuit opinion affirming the dismissal of a employee’s claim of racial harassment involving the display of a noose, I am reminded of Mark Twain’s quote, "If you tell the truth, you don’t have to remember anything." Its good advice to live by and even better advice for deponents and witnesses.
Nickey
Does Title VII Protect Followers of the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster?
Imagine this, its Friday and you are sitting in your office as Director of Verizon’s newly created Office of Reasonable Accommodation. An employee, I’ll call him Joe, walks into your office. Joe tells you he’s recently converted to the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster (i.e., he is now a Pastafarian); that Friday’s
Fifth Circuit Holds Title VII Damage Caps Apply “Per Party” Not “Per Claim”
In an issue of first impression in the Fifth Circuit, the U.S. Court of Appeals holds that Title VII’s damages cap apply on a "per party" basis rather than on "per claim." In Black v. Pan American, the Plaintiff, Carleen Black, prevailed on her Title VII and TCHRA claims of sex discrimination and
Fifth Circuit Holds Loss of Consortium Damages Unavailable To Spouse of Successful Title VII Plaintiff
The Fifth Circuit held today that a spouse of a successful Title VII plaintiff cannot maintain a legal claim for loss of consortium (i.e., loss of spousal services) under state and federal law. In Barker, Tracey Barker was a civilian worker employed by Halliburton (aka KBR). She claimed she was subjected to sexual harassment, retaliation and
Supreme Court Recognizes Third-Party Retaliation Claims under Title VII
The U.S. Supreme Court announced that employees, who never engaged in protected activity, can bring third-party retaliation claims against their employers when they suffer an adverse employment action due to their connection with a person who has engaged in protected activity.
The facts of Thompson v. North American Stainless are straightforward. In February 2003 North American Stainless was
U.S. Supreme Court Reverses Disparate Impact Win for Employer
The U.S. Supreme Court reversed and remanded a win the City of Chicago obtained against an African-American class of firefighter applicants seeking positions with the City. In Lewis v. City of Chicago, a group of firefighter applicants filed a lawsuit against the City challenging the City’s 1996 decision that it would only consider those applicants who scored "well-qualified" on